Friday, April 22, 2011

Home Studios - Less Is More.

My name is Scott... and I'm a recovering "gear-aholic". There, I said it. I've put off this admission for a long time, but there's no denying or wishing away what you know to be true...

That simple statement came into my head today, as I was thinking about my ongoing work on my current batch of recordings. I've been doing this home recording thing for well over 15 years now, and I think anyone who's been into it like I have knows that, over time, you start to accumulate... stuff. Instruments. Amplifiers. Recording equipment. Cables and other accessories. If you're not careful, the accumulation of these things can overwhelm, to the point where it becomes a hindrance to your creativity, instead of feeding and nurturing it. I've battled with this "problem" for years, and I feel it's time to finally do something about it.

I started recording music at home back in the early to mid-90's, and though I was a young musician who hadn't been playing any instrument for very long (and couldn't sing all that great either), I was eager to learn. Eager to create something that was important to me, if no one else. I was also driven by artists like Prince and Stevie Wonder, who played most if not all of the instruments on some of their most popular records. That got me excited to see if I could pull off some of that myself someday.

As my short money would allow, I would upgrade to more and more pieces of equipment. Guitars, effects, amps, drum machines, keyboards. But the game-changer was my first 4-track cassette recorder. It was a revelation AND a revolution! It was the last piece of the puzzle to finally give me at least a taste of the sounds that I was hearing in my head, and it was a great learning experience. But what was an even greater lesson was when I met the bandmates of the very first band I played in. They recorded with 4-tracks like I did. But when they played me their songs... It was an eye-opener, on different levels.

The lesson learned then, was to keep it simple. Less is more. In those early days, I was stuck in the trap of trying to make my music sound like it was played by an entire band, when in reality it was just me, and my fancy equipment. Stevie and Prince did it, I can too, right? Well maybe, maybe not. They were the exception, not the rule. And I've come to terms with the fact that I'm not the exception. But it doesn't mean that I can't make music that pleases me, and hopefully others. We shall see how that goes...

My bandmates' music had simple arrangements, the playing was never busy, always to-the-point. But the music had impact, and "vibe". That's what I'm going after, every time I attempt to record, to this day. And over the years, I've discovered more artists' music that follows that same ideal, so I feel that I'm on the right track. I'm learning that lesson a little more every day.

The "less is more" motto applies not only to writing and arranging. For me, it now applies to the equipment that I use. These days, I'm about getting as much of it out of my way as possible. The technology has now advanced to the point to that you can do great recordings to easily share with anyone (without embarrassment), with a bare minimum amount of gear. As recent as last year, I had 2 computers, a multi-channel audio interface, a mixer, a drum machine, and 3 keyboards. All that extra equipment was getting in the way of me getting much work done at all, resulting in a hard drive full of abandoned, half-done ideas. Today, I'm working with a laptop, a basic 2-channel Pro Tools interface, microphones, headphones, speakers, a few guitars, a small MIDI keyboard, and my voice. That's everything I need to get my ideas across.

From now on, if there's something not right with the music, it's gonna be on me, not on what equipment I feel that I "need," and don't have. The recordings should be able to stand on their own, because of the energy that I put into the music, not the equipment. In that respect, I feel very liberated these days. Freedom is a beautiful thing...

2006 - Bad...
2007 - Worse...
2009 - Worst!
April 2011 - Under control once again

Saturday, April 16, 2011

The Joy (and PAIN) of Shielding Your Electric Guitar

Greetings, folks... Here's my first post on electric guitar repairs and/or modifications. There will most likely be more in the future, because ALL of my guitars need some kind of work done on them!

I'm a big fan of Fender electric guitars. The Fender company pioneered a sound for their instruments that has been imitated by countless guitar manufacturers for over 60 years. The major ingredient to this original sound is in their single-coil pickups. For those not familiar with how electric guitars work, a pickup basically serves as a microphone for the strings, to amplify the sound. The single-coil pickup itself has been around long before Fender (since the 1920's!), but Fender's own patented design definitely has a sound unlike any other.

But as any Fender guitar player knows, the major drawback in that pickup's design is that it can be noisy, especially with your amp set at higher volumes. The most common technical term for this noise is "60-cycle hum". It can be best described verbally as a constant buzzing sound. Without going into more technical details (because I can't, haha), basically the pickup acts as an antenna, picking up interference from other electrical appliances or equipment in the general area of where the guitar is located. This interference is passed though the guitar's wiring, out to the amplifier's speaker as noise, or "hum". A combination of those contributing factors can increase the amount of hum, to the point that the guitar may be considered unusable, especially when performing live on stage. And since so many things around us are "electrified", it makes this problem all the harder to avoid!

Because this hum is inherent in the design of the pickup, it unfortunately can't be eliminated completely. Many have worked for years on methods to reduce the offending noise. In fact, elimination of the hum is the main function the design of the double-coiled "humbucker" pickup serves, and it does a very good job for that purpose. You typically don't get any of the described hum from a well-built humbucker pickup, as the two coils work together to cancel out, or "buck", the hum. However, the humbucker pickup sounds somewhat different than a single-coil, which is why many players who love and prefer the "Fender sound" suffer through that drawback of extra hum and noise, doing what they can to work around it.

Through much online research, I've found many articles reporting that electrical shielding can significantly reduce unwanted noise, including the single-coil pickup's forever-present hum. Many sites have documented instructions on how to do this. It's a fairly involved process. You may wonder, "if it helps reduce the hum, why don't the manufacturers do the shielding at the factory during the building process"? Actually many factories do, to a degree, but the shielding I've seen inside my own guitars seems to be minimal at best. If they did better, more thorough jobs in their shielding, I'm sure due to the amount of labor involved, it would drive up the prices of the guitars considerably.

I'd been wanting to give the shielding jobs a go on my own guitars for a while now, and last weekend I finally got down to business. I have a few electric guitars, but my current "main" guitar is a Fender Telecaster. I've had it since 2007, and I decided that it would be the one to start with. After removing the pickguard and control panel, I could see that it would probably benefit from a shielding job since I'm always struggling with the hum problem, especially when recording with it.

It's "business time"

I purchased what I needed for the job from an online store I recently discovered called Stewart-MacDonald, or "StewMac", a supply store for luthiers (makers of stringed instruments). They seem to have *literally* everything a do-it-yourselfer would want in tools and supplies. Some of the stuff they sell can be difficult or impossible to find at a Guitar Center, or similar music store. I was on the site for hours, finding things I could use, stuff I don't necessarily need, but want anyway... I had to get off that site quick, before I gave them ALL my money... They also had a great article with included pictures on how to perform the shielding job.

Shielding Kit from Stew-Mac

The main supply needed for this job consisted of copper shielding tape. Copper is reputed to be best for electrical shielding. The tape is applied to the cavities that are routed into the guitar's body. It is also applied to the underside of the pickguard (that also holds the front pickup), which is screwed into the body. Basically, if all the shielded parts are connected (touching) physically, it creates a ground connection when your guitar is plugged into your amp, thus creating your shield. The article also explained that if you put a small amount of the tape on the outer edge of the cavities, it will come in contact with the tape on the pickguard. Sounds easy enough to do, right? Well I suppose so, if you've done it before... But since this was my first attempt, it took pretty much ALL day! Mainly, because I didn't want to screw anything up - this guitar was NOT cheap...

Opening up the Tele

Copper tape applied to the cavities

Copper tape applied to pickguard

Anyway, the "pain" part of this job came during the application of the copper tape to the pickguard. In my reading, I was warned that the edges of copper tape can be VERY sharp, and to be careful. And I *was* pretty careful, until I ran my thumb along the edge of the pickguard which, itself, is fairly dull plastic. But I forgot that the edge of the tape was also running along that very same edge of the pickguard, when I proceeded to slice a nice clean cut into the meat of my thumb... OUCH!!! And nearly a week to the day after putting a nice slice into my other thumb, in the kitchen... Not a good week for thumbs, I suppose. OK, lesson learned...  I cleaned myself up, and continued with the job.

Flesh vs. Copper Tape - Guess who wins? (photo taken 1 week later)

Well, after putting the guitar all back together, plugging it in and testing it out, I wish I could now describe to you the "joy" part of the process. However, it's really hard for me to tell if there's much of an improvement. I think there may be *some* reduction in hum, but not nearly as much as I'd hoped. If I turn around to a certain position while holding the guitar, it eliminates almost ALL the hum, but that was pretty much always my method of dealing with the hum problem, before the shielding job. To my ears, it does seem a bit quieter in that certain position than before, but that may be wishful thinking, after all that work... Perhaps the copper tape is not connecting somewhere, who knows? All I know is that I'm now burned out on it, so I'm not gonna be taking that guitar apart again any time in the near future, haha...

I will say though, that it was definitely a learning experience for me. As I mentioned, I have other guitars, all of which could probably benefit from these shielding jobs, so perhaps I'll have better success with them, now that I have a better idea of what I'm doing. Until next time...

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Amazon & the Future of The Cloud

Another weekend is upon us.  Like most weeks, it felt like I wasn't gonna make it to the end...  Anyway, I thought I'd check in once again with a thought about the future.

With the state of things in 2011, one has several options when it comes to purchasing music. However, the advent of digital distribution of music has made it all too easy to simply give an online merchant your credit card number, and *VOILA*, you're downloading one or more albums' worth of music to your computer (or mobile phone!) within a matter of minutes. Along with high speed broadband connections, they have made it so convenient for us, that not very many of us need or even want to purchase CD's anymore - be it online, or "brick-and-mortar". I'm not telling you anything you don't know already, I'm sure. This is simply a setup for my recent experience in purchasing music online, which was a bit different from my other experiences in recent times.

You see, it all started with the recent release of the new album by Radiohead, which has been a favorite band of mine for some time now. Like many other album releases before it, once again I was confronted by several choices in regards to purchase. I have been an iTunes member since 2005, and it quickly became my primary source for purchasing new music, like so many other folks out there. But as a somewhat older music fan, I still like the (now) old-school method of buying a physical product (almost always a CD these days), which typically comes with artwork and "liner notes" that detail track lists and lyrics, along with musician, producer and other studio related credits. Once I have the CD, I can then export the music into my computer via iTunes. Not to mention that with a CD, I'd also have a physical back-up of the music, should something happen with my computer. These days, if there is a new release by a "favorite" artist of mine, I find myself weighing the pros and cons of buying a physical CD, or buying a download from either iTunes, or more recently, Amazon MP3. For less "important" artists, or those whose music I'm just discovering, I almost invariably go the download route. My method of music purchasing in a nutshell...

The other night, I finally decided to look into buying the new Radiohead album, as it had already been out for at least 2 weeks or so. Digital download or CD? I hadn't decided yet. It was at that point, I discovered an offer that I couldn't refuse... As the first option, Amazon had the physical CD available for $9.99 - a pretty decent price for a new CD in 2011. This particular album is only 8 tracks long, so that may have something to do with it. Anyway, they also had an MP3 download of the album available for $5.99!  I was pretty amazed at such a deal!

Amazon had recently launched their Cloud Drive and Cloud Music Player for their members. You get 5GB of Internet-based storage, free of charge. For those not aware, "cloud" is a modern synonym for "the Internet". I believe you can upload any type of files you wish, but along with the Cloud Player, they are advertising it as a new way to store all your digital music in one place, so you may access it from any computer, or mobile device. If you purchase MP3 music from Amazon, you have the option of having it automatically stored in your Cloud Drive, with the additional option of downloading the music to your computer, so you may have your music both there, and "in the cloud".  Additionally, Amazon MP3 purchases do NOT count towards your Cloud Drive's capacity; only files that you upload from your computer.  Pretty cool!  They have paid options available for more storage. For those of you with Android smart phones, there is an Amazon Cloud Player app available to play your music.

The thing that sealed it for me to buy the MP3 version of the album was Amazon's offer to not only sign me up for their new Cloud Player service automatically, but upgrade my Cloud Drive capacity from the standard free-of-charge 5GB, up to 20GB, for a year. That's pretty major, in my opinion. Checking with iTunes first just to make sure before I commit, they are currently charging $9.99 for their AAC digital files of that particular album, with no "digital booklet" - another thing I look for when considering a new music purchase. iTunes offers a digital .pdf file of liner notes and credits for many of their albums - Amazon does not. However, Amazon still got my credit card digits for this one. Sorry iTunes, but this offer was simply too good to pass up...

So this is my very roundabout way of saying that I eventually went with Amazon MP3 for this purchase, in part due to my intrigue with the offer of 20GB of free cloud storage for a year. How I plan to actually use this 20GB, I don't know, but I'm sure some opportunity will come up before the year's through, haha. Apple has been long-rumored to announce some sort of cloud-based version of iTunes, but it has yet to materialize. With this new cloud service from Amazon, I'd say an announcement from Apple can't be far behind.

The subject of cloud storage and cloud computing is big in the tech news world these days, and it's quite apparent with introductory deals such as these, companies like Amazon are looking to be early facilitators of this new technology that allows users to store and access their data. It looks as though we, the public, will very soon be relying less on our personal computers and mobile devices for data storage, and more on companies willing to host (and hopefully backup!) our data. Meanwhile, these companies will be finding new ways to make some dough off of us (either on the front or the back end), for the use of these services. Yes, these certainly are changing times...
Cloud Drive - Mostly empty, for now
Cloud Player

Saturday, April 2, 2011

iPod Resurrection with CompactFlash, Part 1

Well, here I go - my maiden voyage into this blogging thing. Many, many years after everyone else has gotten into it, but I've been a late starter at most things in life. Anyway, here's a description of the first of many "fixit" projects that I have planned this year...

I'm currently on a mission to revive my until-now-ever-reliable 4th Gen iPod that I've had since 2006 or so. It's given me years of musical enjoyment, especially over the last year when I installed it into my car stereo system. But over the last month, it started giving me occasional trouble, until one day...


He's been sick...


Not a good sign when you turn on your iPod, you hear the hard drive making strange noises, and get that screen! Tried as I did, I could not get it going again (even with the helpful URL that you see in the pic). So I took a breath and resigned myself to the fact that my old friend was no more, at least the hard drive was.

Online searches for replacement drives came up with very little. New drives for old iPods such as mine are simply not out there, far as I can tell. The websites that have used drives for sale are asking more than I'm willing to pay. Why bother buying a used hard drive that just may die on me in another year, perhaps sooner?

Further searches uncovered some interesting reading about people who have replaced the drives in their old iPods using CompactFlash media cards, with the help of a special adapter.

I found the adapter on Amazon for about $7.00 and some change. Another quick Amazon search pointed me to a 32GB CF card for about $50. Cheaper than the price of a used hard drive, and about half the cost of other CF cards of the same capacity that I've seen (I think due to the speed of the card itself). Definitely cheaper than a whole new iPod! Besides, I really like this particular model, and combining it with the benefits of flash storage (no moving parts to eventually fail like a hard drive can), it's the best of both worlds, I think.

Ready to go to work

Well, I ordered all my parts and waited patiently for their arrival. Once delivered, I made plans on a Saturday to do the installation. All was going well at first, until... I realized that the adapter card was not going to fit my model of iPod. It has a connector on it that's compatible with newer iPod models than what I have. Then things went worse... Soon after, I managed to rip a piece off of the iPod's logic board - so it's now ruined.  Insert curse word... here.

But all is not completely lost just yet. I made arrangements with the Amazon merchant to exchange the adapter for the correct one, and I managed to find someone selling used, tested iPod logic boards that won't cost me an arm and a leg. Stay tuned...